By the Waters of Babylon Essay

impartiality is a effortful deer to hunt. If you eat too oftentimes fairness at once, you may die of the justness. It was non lazily that our fathers forbade the Dead Places.The truth is a very important involve custodyt for an individual. It can be very workoutful or very destructive depending on how it is use upd. The significance of the quote do by Johns father could be broken round off in to three different sections according to each record. First of these statements is Truth is a had deer to hunt. the second of these statements is If you eat too much truth at once, you may die of the truth. and the final statement is It was not idly that our fathers forbade the Dead Places.Truth is a hard deer to hunt. The literal intend of the statement could be interpreted as the truth is hard to find. thusly the question arises, is it hard to find physically or is it hard to grok mentally? A sizeable example of the physical part of decision the truth was when John went on h is journey to the Dead Places. A good example of jabing the truth mentally was when he saw the drained god in the chair, but upon farther examination he agnize he was a man quite a than a god. The correct variant is the second one the truth is hard to grasp. For example you could tell a person the truth, but until they have been provided evidence or mental reassurance they skill not necessity to bank the truth making it hard to grasp or in the words of Johns father a hard deer to hunt.This leads to the next statement If you eat too much truth at once, you may die of the truth. The meaning of this statement is that the truth can be very dangerous. It is also related to the first statement in the sense that once a person grasps and understands the truth, the next coiffure is how they are going to react to it. If its a good liaison they superpowerreact positively, but if its a bad thing then its vice versa. In the case of the John and his deal the truth is neither bad nor g ood rather it is different in the sense that it could be what they want it to be. They could both eat the truth and use it to violate themselves and their way of life or they could die of the truth and use it to actor nut house and destruction as the gods had done. The more likely of the ii to occur is the second one.The reason for that is the fact that the truth is against the beliefs of the hill state and when something is against the beliefs or customs of someone they dont tend to believe it. In this case the hill multitude would have a hard time believing that the gods they believe in were actually pot and impart get confused between reality and religion. Also if the hill people learn of the advanced technology that the gods had then they might or might not use it in a productive way and cause destruction upon themselves like the god had.This leads to the last sentence It was not idly that our fathers forbade the Dead Places. This means that their fathers had a reason wh en they decided to forbid the people from going to the Dead Places. The reason that they had was to protect their people from the unknown and the truth to ensure their well being and safety. The fathers of the hill people did not want the same ending for their people as it had been for the gods or people out front them. They knew that if the hill people got the technology or weapons that the gods or people in advance them had then there would be a great possibility of chaos and destruction. In order for them to protect their people the fathers created rules and customs, but they also left field their people in the dark.Finally, I personally do not hold up with this implication because I do not believe in belongings the truth from anyone. I also think that leaders should not halt a truth as big as this one from their people, purge though their intentions are to protect society. Keeping thetruth from the people is looking at only one perspective. How did the fathers know that th e truth would destroy the people? knowledge is something a person must share for the betterment of society. Instead of shutting off the past, the fathers should have opened it up to there people and check their people to learn from the mistakes of the past.John, a priest and a son of a priest went against his predecessors and learned about the previous civilization and its mistakes. This do him understand how to create a civilization that would last. It also makes him a better leader. In the end John thinks, But they were men who built the city, not gods or demons. They were men. I remember the dead mans face. They were men who were here before us. We must build again. This is proof that the implication is price and that it creates restrictionsupon John people. By John thinking like this he forget enable his people to move forward, remove the restrictions in their lives, and create a thirst of knowledge that will make his people better rather than worse.