Critical literature review Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 3000 words

deprecative - Literature review ExampleThis insufficiency of theory base knowledge undoubtedly brings the importance of evidence based learning and understanding. In the field of medicine, healing is vastly defined. Many authors have not been able to limitise its definition and conceit within a few phonation sentences. This brings the presence of vast dimensions within the work out of healing. It is not only linked with the physical parts of compassionate body, but also finds its application in psychology and unearthlyity as well. And many researchers have essay to define healing in patients with chronic illness, disability, pain and at the end of life (Kigler, 2004 Marshall et al. 2004 Geller et al., 2004 Cherkin & Sherman, 2004 Waters, 2006 Farber, 2002 Silver, 2004). Additionally, versatile other fields such as nursing and anthropology have also identified it to be a reusable part of their practices. As we are critically analysing two clauses- meliorate in Primary Care A mass shared by patients, physicians, nurses and clinical staff and Understanding healing relationship in original care, it is more appropriate to define healing, which is defined as a multidimensional process with randy, physical and spiritual dimensions (Hsu et al., 2008). This definition of healing is sufficiently consistent with the healing definition in other literatures (Hsu et al. 2008,Egnew, 2005, Dossey, 2003 Wendler, 1996) Each article has a different summary. In the article better in primary care a vision shared by patients, physicians, nurses and clinical staff, the fundamental focus of the center groups was to obtain understanding of the fundamental concept of healing among patients, physicians, nurses and clinical staff also, what they consider as facilitators and barriers to promoting healing in primary care were discussed. In this article, for the purpose of learning via evidence based, the instrument of focused group is used in which nine focused groups were a rranged with 84 participants, 28 patients, 23 primary care physicians (19 family physicians), 11 licensed practical nurses, 20 registered nurses, and 2 medical assistants. On the other hand, in the article understanding healing relationship in primary care, much emphasis is given to highlight and understand the development and maintenance of healing relationships surrounded by patients and clinicians. Here, the method of interview was used to serve the objectives of healing relationships with three processes resulted as fostering healing relationships-valuing non-judgmental emotional bond, working in a way to serve the maximum facilitation for patients and displaying a caring attitude towards patients. Critical evaluation of these articles serves the objectives of this literature review. The methods, data, outcomes and theories enlisted in both articles are going to be made part of this process of assessment with a critical look. Have these two articles really served the way for wh ich they were planned? Have these objectives provided something useful towards the process and practice of healing? These are the fundamental questions are discussed further below. Critical evaluation Healing in primary care A vision shared by patients, physicians, nurses and clinical staff Healing is a fundamental part of medical science, yet its role is insufficiently understood in the in advance(p) health care system (Brody, 1992 Lown, 1996 Cassell, 1991). In this article, many